That’s not good.
Share Options
Share a link too this article
Applying to law school is bad enough. Throwing your future into the hands of administrators applying bespoke black box methodologies to weigh your life’s work and a 4-hour test. Prospective students shouldn’t have to deal with exploding offers of financial assistance while waiting on a final decision from the 10 other schools on the list.
An ominous thread on r/lawschooladmissions, suggests that at least one school has started playing games with student finances as a means of controlling its student population.
PLI honors Toby J. Rothschild with its inaugural Victor J. Rubino Award for Excellence in Pro Bono Training, recognizing his dedication and impact.
That’s a full-tuition scholarship offer reduced to $15,680 less than a week later. And, as the quoted passage indicates, the school made this cut based on who hadn’t yet submitted a seat deposit.
The deposit isn’t even due for three weeks!
What the school calls “an unanticipated level of interest” should properly be called “an entirely expected level of interest.” Roughly, oh, 8 years ago we went through all this already. That’s when Donald Trump first ascended to the Oval Office and students flocked to law schools to defend the rule of law. In retrospect, the assault on the sanctity of the Constitution in 2017 seems quaint by comparison. Say what you will about obstructing justice we weren’t actively disappearing people to slave camps yet. Would law schools see another “Trump bump” in applications after November? OBVIOUSLY!
A “human-in-the-loop” approach helps us bring responsible and effective AI solutions together.
And that’s before adding the historical jump in admissions during times of economic uncertainty — the sort of uptick that might materialize when the White House decides to model its economic policy around replaying the Great Depression’s greatest hits.
Every law school should’ve been able to see this coming since right around 11 p.m. Eastern, November 5, 2024.
Moreover, a school just can’t fire off an email a few days after awarding a scholarship to say, “Oopsie.” It undermines trust in the admissions process and can have long-term repercussions, affecting the school’s reputation and its ability to attract top talent in the future.​ Remember the black eye one school took for threatening to revoke scholarships if students put down deposits at other schools while going through the process.
There are so many better alternatives if a school finds itself a victim of poor planning. For instance, the school could have:​
In the competitive realm of legal education, maintaining integrity in admissions practices is paramount. Arizona Law’s recent actions serve as a cautionary tale for institutions nationwide.
HeadshotJoe Patrice is a senior editor at Above the Law and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. Feel free to email any tips, questions, or comments. Follow him on Twitter or Bluesky if you’re interested in law, politics, and a healthy dose of college sports news. Joe also serves as a Managing Director at RPN Executive Search.
LexisNexis’ ‘multi-doc’ feature for Automated Templates will add new efficiencies to your practice. Here’s how.
Position your firm for long-term growth with better financial visibility and control. Learn how to track performance, manage spending, and plan strategically—download the full e-book now.
Corporate investment and usage in generative AI technologies continues to accelerate. This article offers eight specific tips to consider when creating an AI usage policy.
About
Newsletters
© 2025 Breaking Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Registration or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

source