The uproar over private school scholarship programs, which support the education of more than 150,000 Ohio students, continues to drone on. Critics’ rhetoric can get intense, including labelling these school choice programs an “existential threat” to public education and demeaning them as a “vouchers scheme.” In recent months, detractors have eagerly cited the expense of providing scholarships—about $1 billion per year—likely an effort to smear the programs as bloated and little more than government waste. Skeptical media outlets have also routinely featured the amount in headlines.
A billion dollars is certainly a serious chunk of change. But when considering who these funds support, as well as the amount public schools receive (spoiler alert, it’s $30 billion), scholarship expenditures, at 3 percent of Ohio’s K–12 funding, are not quite as alarming as critics maintain.
Let us first remember that these funds—it’s true!—are being used to educate students. Dollars aren’t just being “given” willy-nilly to private schools, as one op-ed headline once framed it. Schools only receive scholarship funds when parents choose them for their sons and daughters. But who is benefitting from these programs, and how much is being spent on their education? And are the dollars simply going to wealthy folks, as recent news stories have suggested?
The figure below shows the breakdown of funding across all five of the state’s scholarship programs in FY24. We see that a total of $962 million was spent on these initiatives—a sum that is usually rounded to the more outrage-inducing amount of $1 billion.
Figure 1: Scholarship spending across all programs, FY24
A closer look at scholarship spending should calm fears that these dollars are being used in wasteful or inappropriate ways.
In sum, a more careful analysis shows that the vast majority of the $1 billion are being used to support students with disabilities, students who would otherwise attend low-performing public schools, and children from low- and middle-income households. What’s wrong with that? Some continue to argue that taxpayer dollars shouldn’t go to religious schools, but that borders on intolerance to parents who seek an education for their children that aligns with their beliefs. It also ignores the fact that scholarship-receiving families pay their fair share of state and local taxes, too, including taxes that support public schools their children do not attend.
Speaking of public school funding, let us also be mindful that the scholarship expense pales in comparison to their revenues—important context that is almost never mentioned. Instead, critics routinely contend that the $1 billion—and presumably, the 150,000 scholarship students with it—should be rerouted to “underfunded” public schools. As one commentator put it:
Ohio Republicans care about diverting a ton of taxpayer money (desperately needed by cash-strapped, levy-dependent districts) to benefit private school families, regardless of income or need, who choose to send their darlings to diocesan grade schools and religious high schools.
Notwithstanding the cringy name calling of children, the writer is wrong to portray traditional districts as “desperately…cash-strapped.” In FY24, public schools received $30 billion—thirty times more funding than what’s spent on private school scholarships. Of course, public schools enroll more students, but not anywhere near thirty times more students (it’s about ten times). Hence, on a per-pupil basis, public school funding is 2.8 times the average scholarship amount across all five programs ($18,183 versus $6,521). As the table below indicates, this is no one-year blip: Public school funding also greatly exceeded scholarship funding in FY22 and FY23, as well.
Table 1: Public school funding versus scholarship amounts
* * *
Sky-is-falling rhetoric is par for the course when it comes to private school scholarship programs. But the hysteria rarely matches reality. As for the $1 billion being spent on scholarship programs, the truth is that the vast majority of these funds support less advantaged families who rely on scholarships to enroll their child in a private school of their choice. Meanwhile, scholarship spending remains small in comparison to overall public school funding. As Ohio continues to debate school choice programs, here’s hoping for a calmer, more fact-driven discussion.
Aaron Churchill is the Ohio research director for the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, where he has worked since 2012. In this role, Aaron oversees research and commentary aimed at strengthening education policy in Ohio. He writes regularly on Fordham’s blog, the Ohio Gadfly Daily on topics such as…
© 2020 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement
1015 18th St NW, Suite 902
Washington, DC 20036
202.223.5452
[email protected]
P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202
614.223.1580
[email protected]
130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402
937.227.3368
[email protected]
